tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6912603287930240451.post3430425427824018952..comments2024-03-29T07:40:52.031+00:00Comments on Noncommutative Geometry: EULER'S ARCHIMEDEAN FACTORS AND NCG by Katia ConsaniUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6912603287930240451.post-46659763456038843102007-07-04T16:34:00.000+00:002007-07-04T16:34:00.000+00:00Dear Chris,your comment and questions bring up a q...Dear Chris,<BR/><BR/>your comment and questions bring up a quite interesting and central topic in arithmetic geometry: a coherent unification in the definition of the local Euler's factors (archimedean and non) <BR/>is one of the `dreams' in number-theory, one of my dreams, at least...<BR/><BR/>The interpretation of the archimedean factor by means of a regularized determinant for the action ofKC (= Katia Consani)https://www.blogger.com/profile/12442719430556938476noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6912603287930240451.post-6338220343158508012007-07-03T16:32:00.000+00:002007-07-03T16:32:00.000+00:00Is there a relation between Eulerian factors at fi...Is there a relation between Eulerian factors at finite and infinite places? We know both are determinants<BR/>but apparently of very different operators on very different (conceptually I mean) spaces! Is it too much to hope to unify the too?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com